1Center for Cognitive and Decision Sciences, University of Basel; 2Department of Psychology, University of Bern; 3Department of Statistics, TU Dortmund University
Understanding whether risk preference represents a stable, coherent trait is central to efforts aimed at explaining, predicting, and preventing risk-related behaviours. We help characterise the nature of the construct by adopting an individual participant data meta-analytic approach to summarise the temporal stability of over 350 risk preference measures (33 panels, 57 samples, >575,000 respondents). Our findings reveal significant heterogeneity across and within measure categories (propensity, frequency, behaviour),domains (e.g., investment, occupational, alcohol consumption), and sample characteristics(e.g., age). Specifically, while self-reported propensity and frequency measures of risk preference show a higher degree of stability relative to behavioural measures, these patterns are moderated by domain and age. Crucially, an analysis of convergent validity reveals a low agreement across measures, questioning the idea that they capture the same underlying phenomena. Our results raise concerns about the coherence and measurement of the risk preference construct.
A pre-print is accessible on PsyArxiv. We make the estimated test-retest correlations and inter-correlations from the primary data sources as well as all analysis scripts publicly available in an OSF repository.
This is the companion website for the study Meta-Analyses of the Temporal Stability and Convergent Validity of Risk Preference Measures. Here, we provide additional information on the data, analyses and results reported in the manuscript: